It looks as though my donation put Obama on the road to victory! If he wins Texas it’s all over! He won Hawaii in a landslide!
So much for the good news…
I have this nagging feeling in the back of my neck. Do you remember 2000 and the presidential race that ended in a world-class embarrassing way? How about the fact that George Bush won AGAIN in ’04. Now I grant you that Kerry had about as much charisma as a dog turd. I am simply pointing out a pattern that continued with Arnold Schwarzenegger winning the Governorship in Kalifornya.
I guess I am nervous about any “funny stuff” in the voting.
I find it hard to believe that with 100% of the precincts reporting…How is it that there are barely over 37,000 votes tallied? I realize that Hawaii is a series of Islands, but there are well over 1,000,000 adults there. This isn’t another one of those voting incidents, is it?
Clinton is getting 5 delegates for a certain percentage of the votes.
Will this play heavily later? Don’t you think that “the powers that be” know EXACTLY how many votes and delegates are needed in order to win? They can make sure that the popular vote and the delegate vote don’t necessarily come up with the same winner. This could go on to the electoral college as well. Remember, we as the people, don’t actually, technically, vote for our President.
As a technophile and self-declared nerd, I STILL do not trust votes or the counting of votes with machines. Let alone that archaic electoral college. who are those people anyway?
In my quest to create learning tools and user interfaces that are accessible to everyone, I have come in to contact with Sterling Creations. They have a free E online newsletter with interesting and timely articles. Here is one about accessibility issues with the iPhone.
Apple does address some 508 issues HERE but there is more they could do.
iPhones and the Disability Divide
By Edward J. Heaton
August 2007 Column
In all the hype about Apple’s new and revolutionary iPhone, it seems that one segment of the population has been ignored. As usual, it’s persons with disabilities.
The most revolutionary feature of the iPhone is supposed to be its user interface, which consists of a touch screen. A touch screen interface does not allow persons with limited mobility in their hands, or persons who are blind, to use the iPhone. Early sales estimates say that in the first weekend of sales (June 29 to July 2), up to 750,000 units were sold. The effect of the iPhone is not just limited to Apple products. According to Fortune Magazine’s David Kirkpatrick, “every other handheld device maker no doubt will immediately start trying to imitate [the iPhone’s touch screen interface].”
If this is true, then PWDs will really be in a hole. The debate on whether iPhones should or should not be accessible has already started on Apple user websites. There are two schools of thought. The first is that if you are blind, why would you buy an iPhone? The second is that one cannot determine who wants to use the technology.
The iPhone was introduced in January by Steve Jobs. In the six months since then, I have seen no disabled organization, such as the National Association of the Blind, or any ADA-related group come up with a position on whether or not the iPhone should be handicapped accessible. Given the other serious issues facing the disability community, I can certainly understand the oversight. However, given the early and probably ongoing success of the iPhone, I think this will become an issue as more companies attempt to either license or come up with their own version of the Apple technology.
According to “Disability and the Digital Divide”, a report released in 2006 by RTC Rural, “[t]he most current data (October 2003) show Internet use by fewer than 30% of those with disabilities over age 15 while more than 60% of those with no disability used the Internet at some location.” If people with disabilities are already using the Internet half as much as people without disabilities, the iPhone will only continue to swing the pendulum in the wrong direction.
What needs to be done? Organizations, such as National Organization on Disability, and the American Association of Persons with Disabilities, need to push for accessibility standards for all devices that will use the iPhone technology. Currently, in America, there are approximately 30,000 ATMs that are accessible to people with low vision by the use of a headphone jack. Perhaps a similar arrangement can be developed for the iPhone. This needs to be done because of the other feature of the iPhone: that it acts as a true mobile computer that allows consumers to surf the Web as if they were at home on their own computer. The digital divide is already wide enough. We need to ensure that it doesn’t become the digital chasm.